Fri, Sep 5, 2025 to Fri, Apr 17, 2026
10:00 am - 12:00 pm

Access Institute

110 Gough Street, Suite 301
San Francisco, CA 94102
Type: 
Intensive Study Group
CE Credits: 
58.00
Participant Limit: 
15
Tuition: 

General Public: $2610
$500 deposit with registration;
$2110
 balance due Friday, August 22, 2025

NCSPP Members: $2030
$500 deposit with registration;
$1530 balance due Friday, August 22, 2025

NCSPP CMH Members: $1856
$300 deposit with registration;
$1556 balance due Friday, August 22, 2025

Scholarship: 
One scholarship may be granted subject to space availability. Scholarship applications must be received by Friday, August 22, 2025. For more information and to request a scholarship application, please contact Niki Clay.

Registration Notes: 

NCSPP offers online course registration and payment using PayPal, the Internet’s most trusted payment processor. All major credit cards, as well as checking account debit payments, are accepted.

 

2025-2026 Intensive Study Group
On Perversion

Course Overview: 

From September 5, 2025  April 17, 2026

In this yearlong course, we will explore the provocative and “polymorphous” psychoanalytic topic of perversion and its manifestations and intersections in the clinic and beyond. The course brings together classical and contemporary psychoanalytic approaches to examine perversion’s complex place in our individual dimensions and broader collective formations.

As we face an urgent time in our contemporary moment in which perversity is increasingly visible in sociopolitical discourse and practice, we will aim to study perversion with the depth and focus it requires as both an intrapsychic and sociocultural phenomenon. The course will survey the shifting definitions and uses of the concept of perversion, from Freud’s foundational metapsychological formulations to its reworkings by figures such as Bollas, Stein, and Grunberger. The course will consider how psychoanalysis has historically pathologized or marginalized certain forms of desire, and how recent interdisciplinary scholarship opens space for more nuanced and liberatory understandings.

Clinically, perversion’s creative-destructive potential will be investigated, drawing from diverse psychoanalytic schools which will include thinking from French psychoanalysis, the British Independent tradition, and American intersubjectivism. We will supplement our inquiry with philosophical and political texts by writers such as Foucault, Bataille, Bersani, and Sharpe. Finally, the course will culminate with a thorough examination of Lacan’s structural reading of perversion, inhabiting its contradictions in clinical and cultural life.

Click here for detailed information about individual ISG segments.

Commitment to Equity: 

NCSPP is aware that historically psychoanalysis has either excluded or pathologized groups outside of the dominant population in terms of age, race, ethnicity, nationality, language, gender, religion, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, disability, and size. As an organization, we are committed to bringing awareness to matters of anti-oppression, inequity, inequality, diversity, and inclusion as they pertain to our educational offerings, our theoretical orientation, our community, and the broader world we all inhabit.

Presenters' Responses:

Janie Riley: The topic of perversion and its history of misuse as a term that has pathologized certain groups makes it imperative for me to teach on the subject in a way that explicitly discusses our field’s past harmful effects as well as the ways in which our field has contributed to our understanding of perversion as a viable method to address some challenging problems brought into therapy by ourselves and our patients. I strive to teach and write from both an intrapsychic as well as socio-cultural-political perspective to contribute to our field’s grasp of the intertwinement of the two and of the many. I am continuously striving to be aware of the privileges I hold as well as those in which I do not. This practice enables me to work toward an understanding of my personal biases so I am able to recognize them while practicing as a teacher as well as clinician. As a person who identifies as white, I have participated in ongoing dialogues amongst my peers about our personal and collective engagement of whiteness studies, anti-racism, as well as multiple forms of anti-oppression.

Daniel Butler: This course explicitly addresses how psychoanalytic praxis does and doesn’t address the experiences of marginalized peoples. Rather than analyzing dominant social groups, we’ll examine the violence through which dominant social groups secure their power. Studying social violence won’t be an afterthought; it’s integral to the course material.

Michael Levin: No participants will be discriminated against on the basis of immutable characteristics or collective identifications in this class. If time permits, we may explore the ways that the recent institutional embrace of identitarian ideology in the psychoanalytic movement can be understood as an ethical and metapsychological perversion of the Enlightenment liberal-humanist tradition in which psychoanalysis emerged and upon which it depends.

Sydney Tan: At the end of Seminar XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, Lacan identifies three elements, linked to the analyst’s desire. First, the analyst’s desire is not pure — it is directed toward a particular aim. Second, the analyst’s desire is to obtain the “absolute difference” of the analysand, which inheres in the act of the isolation of the primary signifier. Third, the position of the subject that emerges at the end of analysis is non-phallic, outside the limits of the law and is, as such, “alone” — without a partner in the Other. Lacanian psychoanalysis is oriented toward the singularity of the subject, emphasizing the unique signifiers in the speech of the analysand, and it takes the absolute difference of the analysand from the analyst as the aim of a treatment.

Course Objectives: 

Janie Riley:

  1. Describe Freud’s theory of polymorphous perversion and distinguish between sexuality and the infantile sexual as described by Dominique Scarfone, so as to lay a foundation for understanding the historical roots and evolving ideas about perversion within psychoanalysis.
  2. Define the psychoanalytic term “disavowal” (i.e. of truth, loss, lack) as a concept linked to perversity and discuss Lynn Layton’s applications of perversity and the uses of disavowal within a socio-political context.
  3. List three characteristics of Arnold Cooper’s “central core of perversion” and describe how children in the preoedipal developmental phase begin to employ dehumanization and fantasy as a way to tolerate feelings of overwhelming helplessness.
  4. Explain the role of perversion as part of the “glue” in pathological organizations of the personality as articulated by John Steiner, and articulate how they might “hold” within themselves and with patients, the idea that something at work in the patient or in the therapy dyad is in conflict with the expressed aims of therapy; and compare Steiner’s intrapsychic theory of perverse states with Layton’s ideas about the genesis of perversity located in the social.
  5. Describe two features of Mirilia Aisenstein’s theory of the “masochistic structure of desire,” and demonstrate their grasp of Donald Moss’s theory of “the work of desire” including the difference between two categories of patients who are typically troubled by encounters with desire.
  6. Apply Gila Ashtor’s ideas regarding sex versus sexuality to their clinical thinking and describe Ashtor’s distinction between the two terms; and define Jean LaPlanche’s concept of “enlarged sexuality” to expand Ashtor’s conceptualizations of the universality of perversity within the context of queer theory.
  7. Discuss J. Chasseguet-Smirgel’s conceptualization of perversion as a universal and existential aspect of the psyche desiring and expressing longing to escape from the human condition.
  8. Describe Rosine Perelberg’s formulation of a the link between her violent patient’s “acting out” and his need to preserve the treatment; and utilize Rather’s formulation of difficult countertransference scenarios to address their concerns in working with perversity in their clinical practices.

Daniel Butler:

  1. Define polymorphous perversion.
  2. Distinguish drive, object, and aim.
  3. List three critiques of perversion as a concept.
  4. Distinguish psychoanalytic from non-psychoanalytic theories of sexuality.
  5. Differentiate non-normative sexuality from perverse character structures.
  6. Identify three attributes of perverse character structures.
  7. Apply three interventions for treating perverse character structures.
  8. Apply three interventions for analyzing perverse transference-countertransference dynamics.

Michael Levin:

  1. Discuss Freud’s Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality and how they introduce the psychoanalytic metapsychological and developmental theory of perversion.
  2. Explain how Bela Grunberger expanded on Freud’s theory of perversion to incorporate the role of narcissism.
  3. Discuss the way Ruth Stein elaborates a theory of pathological perversion as a characterological defense against psychosis and describes its manifestations in psychoanalytic clinical transference-countertransference dynamics.
  4. Analyze Christopher Bollas' concept of the Fascist State of Mind to examine how totalitarian psychic structures contribute to perverse dynamics individually and socially.
  5. Compare and contrast the ways Freud, Grunberger, Stein and Bollas conceived of perversion and its functioning and manifestations in psychopathology.
  6. Identify, discuss, and apply fundamental psychoanalytic theoretical concepts and models that aim to define intrapsychic forces and structures underlying psychosexually, morally, socially, and politically perverse impulses, fantasies, personality organizations, and social formations.
  7. Identify, describe, and discuss the developmental, and historical forces involved in the formation of various examples of psychosexually, morally, socially, and politically perverse impulses, fantasies, personality organizations, and social formations from a psychoanalytic theoretical perspective.
  8. Identify, diagnose, and formulate treatment approaches to perverse character disorders and other perverse phenomena encountered in clinical practice, from a psychoanalytic perspective.

Sydney Tan:

  1. Identify and define perversion within the Lacanian framework.
  2. State and specify how perversion and the perverse use of fantasy functions.
  3. Explain the notion of perversion in relation to the imaginary and symbolic phallus.
  4. Identify and situate perversion within the Oedipus problematic.
  5. Explain the role of identification in perversion.
Empirical Reference: 
  • Aisenstein, Marilia, Moss Donald. (2015) Desire and its Discontents. In Sexualities: Contemporary American Perspectives. Alesandra Lemma and Paul Lynch. Eds. Hove, East Sussex. Routledge, Pgs. 63-80
  • Ashtor, Gila. (2025) Erotophobia: Or, Isn’t Everyone a Pervert? In The Queerness of Psychoanalysis: From Freud and Lacan to LaPlanche and Beyond. Venessa Sinclair, Elisabeth Punzi and Myriam Sauer. Eds. Eds. Routledge, New York, NY, Pgs. 196-212
  • Beebe, B., Lachmann, F., Jaffe, J., Markesa,S., Buck, K., Chen, H., Cohen, P., Feldstein, S., & Andrews, H. (2012) Maternal postpartum depressive symptoms and 4 month old mother-infantinteraction. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 29 (4), 383-407.
  • Berggraf, L, P. G. Ulvenes, T. Øktedalen, et al. (2014). Experience of affects predicting sense of self and others in short-term dynamic and cognitive therapy. Psychotherapy, 51(2), 246–257. doi: 10.1037/a0036581.
  • Colli, A, A. Tanzilli, G. Dimaggio, et al. (2014). Patient personality and therapist response: An empirical investigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(1), 102–108. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13020224.
  • Fonagy, P., Rost, F., Carlyle, J. A., McPherson, S., Thomas, R., Pasco Fearon, R. M., ... & Taylor, D. (2015). Pragmatic randomized controlled trial of long‐term psychoanalytic psychotherapy for treatment‐resistant depression: The Tavistock Adult Depression Study (TADS). World Psychiatry, 14(3), 312-321.
  • Jozef Perelberg, R. (2021) The Central Phantasy of Acted Violence. Psychoanalysts in Session: Clinical Glossary of Contemporary Psychoanalysis 105: 62-66
  • Lacan, J. (2023). From an Other to the other: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVI.
  • Lacan, J. (2022). The Object Relation: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book IV.
  • Lacan, J. (2021). Desire and Its Interpretation: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VI.
  • Lacan, J. (2020). Formations of the Unconscious: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book V.
  • Lacan, J. (2017). Transference: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VIII.
  • Layton, Lynn (2018) On Lying and Disillusionment. Psychoanalytic Perspectives 15: 12-24
  • Marmarosh, Cheri. (2012) Empirically Supported Perspectives on Transference in Psychotherapy Theory Research Practice Training, 49(3): 364-9.
  • Rather, Lee (2017) Missing the Analytic Connection: Some Perils of Therapeutic Ambition. Fort Da 23: 66-80
Instructor(s): 

Daniel G. Butler, Ph.D., LMFT, is a psychoanalytic candidate at PINC and a graduate of UC Santa Cruz’s History of Consciousness Program. He teaches at SFCP and Access Institute, serves on the editorial boards of Studies in Gender and Sexuality and Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, and practices in Hayes Valley.

Michael Levin, Psy.D., is a Training Analyst and Faculty Member at SFCP. He has taught about Freud, Laplanche, phenomenology, and psychoanalysis in cultural history. He co-authored Here I'm Alive; The Spirit of Music in Psychoanalysis (Columbia University Press, 2022) and maintains a private practice in San Francisco.

Janie Riley, LMFT, is a psychotherapist and psychoanalyst with a private practice in Oakland. She is on the faculty at PINC and supervises and teaches throughout the Bay Area. She has also served in several clinical and leadership roles in the public health and community mental health sectors.

Sydney Tan, Psy.D., is a clinical psychologist and psychoanalyst, practicing in San Francisco. She teaches on Lacan and Freud and is a member and faculty at SFCP. Her film review, "The Films of Our Lives," was published in fort da, and several of her Latin translations can be found in Impulse. 

Target Audience & Level: 

This course is for clinicians with moderate to extensive experience in clinical work with some background in the principles of psychoanalytic approaches or laypersons with a strong academic or cultural interest in applied or clinical psychoanalysis.

Continuing Education Credit: 

LCSW/MFTs: Courses meet the requirements for 58 hours of continuing education credit for LMFTs, LCSWs, LPCCs and/or LEPS, as required by the CA Board of Behavioral Sciences. NCSPP is approved by the California Association of Marriage and Family Therapists (Provider Number 57020), to sponsor continuing education for LMFTs, LCSWs, LPCCS, and/or LEPs. NCSPP maintains responsibility for this program /course and its content.

Psychologists: Psychologists receive credit through Division 39 upon completion of this course. Division 39 is approved by the American Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education for psychologists. Division 39 maintains responsibility for this program and its content.

Cancellation & Refund Policies: 

Students not admitted due to space limitation will receive a full refund of their deposit.

Cancellations prior to Friday, August 22, 2025: Full refund of deposit minus $100 administration charge.

Cancellations after Friday, August 22, 2025: No refund provided.

Contact Information: 

Administration & Registration questions: Niki Clay, Info@NCSPP.org or (415) 496-9949

ISG Program questions: Sullivan Oakley, MA, SOakley@NCSPP.org

Committee: 

Intensive Study Group Committee

The Intensive Study Group Committee oversees the year-long ISG. Each fall, the committee puts on an Introductory Event featuring invited guest lecturers who speak to theoretical and clinical themes related to the current subject of the ISG. This event is open to all.

Sullivan Oakley, Psy.D., Chair
Melodee Au, MA
Rikki Feuerstein, Psy.D.
Yael Goldstein-Love, MA
Rebecca Shapiro, Psy.D.